Backstage II: still on heroin!
Probably, all sweet and festive atmosphere of Christmas in me must have triggered an allergic reaction . Usually I tend to be accommodating, but "design" on this poll heroines opened my eyes on one thing ...
I always thought it obvious that we "girls" like most, with rare exceptions, the male figures of those women described in the romance. On the other hand, the descriptions of the heroes are made, whether or macho alpha omega, seem to embody the secret dream of every woman.
heroes, in fact, are always beautiful, or at least attractive - so much to be better than beautiful - rich, harassed to the point to delight our sense chioccesco, libertines, moody and arrogant. Despite this their hard rind, which is very "lonely hero into the sunset" - happens to the heroes fall in love as the most naive of rookies, falling into emotional traps banal.
And anyway, the alpha males in the romance are honest with themselves and with us, from the series: "Ok, the girl I like, but I'd better shut up" for a variety of reasons including:
a) I have been cheated once and now I no longer trust ...
b) I'm rich and I could not find out if he wants me or my money ...
c) hate me because I am responsible for the ruin of his brother / father / late husband and then my love would use against me ...
short, usually not the hero shows his love, however, you notice quickly enough and the reader agrees with this sentiment, the decision to keep silent and discomfort associated with it.
But heroin?
The maidens are always so honest? I do not say with the hero, but ... with readers?
is only me deterstarle worse when boiled cauliflower "gigioneggiano?
But yeah, come on, you do not hate the heroines of the moment when you read that
... see the hero at the ball: a charming and proud as the prince of darkness, rises to starry heights on mere mortals it's good, damn fascinating and maybe when he sees them, is also a bit 'provolone ... and them?
avoid it ... the escape ... (And so far nothing to say, is a strategy like so many others) are unwilling to ... (And that's fine too, by Juliet on the world is full of mature ladies who are the suitors under the balcony ...) and say WHY NOT BEAR THE 'E' ARROGANT sensual and provocative, and who can not tolerate the its richness and beauty to convince him to break in every woman's heart and to them, Porelli, beauty / wealth / arrogance etc. etc.. not interested in anything!
But of what?
They want us to believe that it is better with an "s" lisp and ears to the "Bugs Bunny"!? They want to convince us not to delight even a bit ', even for a moment, the fact that this beautiful tome of these Duke de Tal - wake up to ogle their own, after years of aristocratic detachment?
Now.
If some cute maidens - those heroines who just do not like - they want to intrigue the Duke of avoiding it round / challenge / insult, let them, but also seek to intortare readers, I'm not going down!
To be clear:
- love heroines "fashionable" Amanda Quick: abnormal, a little 'airhead, intellectual, funny and trouble admitting - at first only with the player, then even with the hero - the own feelings;
- love heroines "fashionable" Mary Balogh: are often melancholic or trapped in difficult stories, but hardly deny the reader the evidence, when you fall in love.
- hate all those "fragile hothouse flowers" who want to convince anybody that they do not care who the hero is pursuing, but may stumble over the train because, while fleeing, they turn a bit ' too spesso a controllare di non scappare troppo veloce!
E voi?
LLucya 
0 comments:
Post a Comment